Skip to main content

What the SaaS Industry and Dinosaurs Have in Common

AI is shifting the value from software applications to software orchestration


Is that a Meteor approaching?

Since the start of the year SAP and Salesforce stocks have lost significantly - the trend of valuation losses has engulfed the entire SAAS industry since early 2025. While several factors contribute to declining SaaS valuations, investors and stakeholders appear increasingly concerned about one question:

What happens when AI becomes the interface layer between users and software applications?

Resilience Required

The SaaS business model typically sells software products and charges customers per user. With AI replacing human workers it eats into the profits of legacy products, as AI agents eliminate ‘seats’. This is also true in case established SaaS companies offer their own AI tools. The costs of AI tools however are driven by usage, which leads to a tricky question: How to adapt the SaaS business model to AI?


The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse 


Horeseman #1: AI reduces the time and the cost of code generation

AI’s recent coding successes have been remarkable. In 2019 it took OpenAI 168 hours and 32 state-of-the-art chips to develop its GPT-2 chatbot. In 2026 Andrej Karpathy of OpenAI built a similar chatbot with the help of AI in just under three hours and eight off-the-shelf GPUs. 


Horseman #2: SaaS sells applications, AI sells orchestration

Even more telling is SaaS companies’ failure to break out of their specializations. Even a best in breed strategy, as is common among SAP’s or Salesforce’s clients, leaves them at the mercy of SaaS companies’ support for integration and adaptation. Big AI labs on the other hand operate on a higher level and move horizontally across functions and industries. On top of SaaS products they weave a mesh of programs by connecting them with plug-ins that can be controlled by a single chat-based interface. Today a user can ask an AI assistant to gather information from CRM, ERP, email and calendar systems through connectors and present a unified answer. Traditionally, this required navigating several applications individually. 


Horseman #3: AI-native startups

Another factor for the ongoing slump of the SaaS industry is the rise of numerous AI startups that deliver customer-service specifically designed to clients’ needs. One such startup, Sierra, was co-founded by Bret Taylor, the chairman of OpenAI and former co-chief of Salesforce. But there are also many other AI-startups that reach a valuation of 1 billion Dollars in two years.


Horseman #4: DIY software creation

The fourth threat to the SaaS business model is that customers can use AI to build DIY software or even their custom software systems. The question to either ‘build or buy’ is being reevaluated across various industries, ever since progress has moved well beyond ‘vibe coding’ simple tools in order to automate tedious tasks.


Why orchestration matters…

Looking ahead none of this seems to be an imminent threat that might bring down the SaaS industry. SAP and Salesforce are still leading firms with armies of sales personnel and consultants. SaaS incumbents possess significant advantages. Deep customer relationships, trusted ecosystems, and decades of process knowledge may prove harder to disrupt than many AI enthusiasts assume. If SaaS companies manage to adapt their business models by integrating the capabilities of AI, the industry might soon boom again.

Yet this might require a shift in paradigm: Users don’t care about applications, they care about results. A browser, an operating system, a search engine all serve similar purposes: to reduce complexity in the eyes of the user and thus enabling her to achieve the desired results.

The big question will be, how rapidly SaaS companies can reap the benefits of AI and offset losses, before customers buy fewer licences - a typical cannibalization problem. And herein lies the irony: A well known slogan in the software development industry is that “Software eats the world”. Who would have thought that software once would eat itself?

…and adaptation might still decide!

Dinosaurs did not disappear because they were weak. They disappeared because the environment changed faster than they could adapt. The lesson for SaaS companies is the same as it was for the dinosaurs: adaptation matters more than dominance.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Learn To Unlearn

Be Brilliant Subject matter expertise has its perks. Being an expert on any field requires deep learning as well as deliberate practice over years and years. The more professional experience you gain the more you'll swap a minimum principle mindset ('What do I need to do to achieve XY?') for a maximum principle ('How much can I possibly achieve with my available resources?'). When I started as a consultant I had a very basic and fragmented knowledge in most of the technical aspects in my subject matter. At the time I was already a certified and experienced supply chain management expert with some merits. However, as the branch I had worked in (military and defence) neither used the latest technology nor had a business model that promoted short development or change cycles in leadership or management, I did not feel 100% competitive. Therefore I faced some serious challenges when I started my career in the private sector.  At the time when I joined a consulting compa...

Plans and Principles

Why is it that plans can, sometimes even need to change over time? At the same time: Should guiding principles be designed to live long term and to be resistant to short term change? To both questions my answer is a firm yes. Here's why: The principle of the benefit of long lasting habits is one that fascinated me early on. The imagination that any person can improve to levels beyond their own imagination by merely sticking to a habit over a long period still strikes me. One of my oldest habits is sports. I started swimming as a member of a club -and later also as one of a competitive team- as a young teenager and have stuck to some kind of sports habit ever since. When I started first I went to training sessions twice a week. At my peak I did six to eight training sessions a week and most of my school holidays were spent either on training camps or competitions. So my first serious habit was established during those early years. After school I was not always able to swim due to re...

Failure Culture

The Default State of Society The other day I read a post on my company's intranet that stuck with me and made me think. I'll try to give it in my own words: A teacher entered the class room and started to write equations on the board. 1x9 = 9 2x9=18 3x9=27 The class watched and there was only the usual murmur while the teacher proceeded. 4x9=36 5x9=45 6x9=54 7x9=63 8x9=72 9x9=81 10x9=91 On finishing the teacher turned to the class and noticed some murmurs and giggles. He paused for a moment and the giggles increased. Some pupils started to laugh and after a while others joined in until a majority of pupils found amusement in the teacher's mistake and joined the laughter. After a while, when the laughter dampened down, the teacher said: "I made this mistake on purpose in order to demonstrate a point. I wrote ten equations on the board, of which nine were absolutely correct. Most of you however decided to focus on the one equation that was false. None of you gave me any ...